Variability and Genius by Sergey Saveliyev explores the biological origins of genius. The author explains why extraordinary abilities are not the result of effort or upbringing, but rather the manifestation of rare mutations in brain structure. He examines how the instability of neural networks leads to insights, why mass society tends to suppress exceptional individuals, and why nature needs mistakes.
“Human societies tend to punish any kind of exceptionalism. It’s a core instinct rooted in our primate heritage.” – Sergey V. Saveliyev
Key Points:
1. The Biological Nature of Genius
Genius arises from rare mutations in brain development. The brains of geniuses may look similar to ordinary brains but have critical differences in neuroarchitecture. Even minimal changes in structure can lead to radical differences in information processing ability.
A larger brain mass increases the probability of talent but does not guarantee genius. Brain efficiency is determined by the organization of neural connections, not by volume.
Thinking itself evolved as a random byproduct of evolution, not as a planned function. Rare, unstable combinations of neural systems sometimes result in phenomenal abilities.
Moments of insight or creative breakthroughs are not spontaneous; they result from long-hidden neural reconfigurations requiring significant internal changes.
Some geniuses develop an additional integrative structure of consciousness — a third component that unites disparate areas of the brain.
Individual differences among geniuses can be greater than differences between animal species, making a standardized approach to their education impossible.
Brain variability is not a mistake of nature, but a mechanism of evolution: without rare deviations, there would be no progress.
2. The Limits of Upbringing and Development
Genius cannot be cultivated. It is determined by the brain’s structure, which is set during the embryonic stage. Neural network architecture is established before birth and cannot be radically altered by the environment.
Without an innate neural architecture, no amount of parental involvement or elite schooling can create genius. Efforts can only maximize an existing potential but cannot surpass biological limitations.
Attempts to develop “gifted children” without a biological foundation often lead to severe consequences, such as neurotic disorders, mental illness, or social maladaptation.
Artificially induced “early development” often produces imitation skills rather than genuine talent — a desire to meet adult expectations without deep creative thinking. Such children grow up conformist, lacking true originality.
Even with natural giftedness, talent manifests independently of social conditions. A person may realize their exceptional abilities in any sphere — humanitarian or criminal — depending on the environment.
Self-development has strict limits. The brain cannot be “trained” to exceed its morphological potential.
3. Mass Education and Its Limitations
Modern educational systems are designed for the average individual. Their goal is not to foster exceptionality but to standardize knowledge and behavior.
Standardized testing, early diagnostics, and mass training programs are aimed at identifying “average success,” not recognizing genius.
Geniuses often perform poorly on IQ and other standardized tests because their thinking deviates from typical models.
Mass schools for “gifted children” do not solve the problem. Due to vast differences in neuroarchitecture, truly gifted children are too diverse for unified curricula.
Historically, societies applied mechanisms of artificial selection: exceptionally gifted or highly antisocial individuals were either eliminated or marginalized. Stability was prioritized over nurturing exceptionality.
The idea of mass “talent development” systems is based on myths. Genuine change is only possible when a natural potential already exists.
4. The Problems of Socializing Geniuses
Geniuses rarely fit into existing social norms. Their thinking, behavior, and responses differ from societal expectations.
Their ideas are often perceived as dangerous or destructive, and they themselves provoke fear, irritation, or aggression.
Unconscious social mechanisms work against non-standard individuals. Primates evolved strategies to eliminate deviants for the sake of group stability.
Even having a large brain mass, which may aid social adaptation, does not always save a genius from isolation.
Unrealized genius leads to internal conflicts: awareness of their capabilities combined with the impossibility of applying them provokes depression, self-destruction, and alienation.
Many historical geniuses were only recognized decades after their deaths. During their lifetimes, they remained misunderstood and lonely.
Society tends to suppress non-conformity, maintaining the illusion of cognitive and ability equality — a biologically driven strategy for collective survival.
5. Psychological Traits of Geniuses
High brain activity in geniuses is often accompanied by emotional instability. An excess of associations and thought paths creates internal tension and anxiety.
Children with non-standard brain development often face difficulties in socialization: their interests, reactions, and behavior do not match societal expectations.
Laziness, often seen as a character flaw, is biologically a protective mechanism to prevent neural system overload.
Psychiatric disorders, such as depression, bipolar disorder, and anxiety, often accompany outstanding intellectual abilities.
Geniuses face the risk of personal disintegration due to the conflict between the speed of their thinking and their ability to implement it socially.
6. Physical Features of the Brain
Human brain mass can range from 800 to 2300 grams, a unique range among mammals.
However, brain mass alone does not determine intelligence or creative ability. The key lies in the organization and density of neural networks.
Frontal brain fields are unique in every person. For example, Vladimir Mayakovsky exhibited an additional cortical area in Brodmann Area 47.
Subcortical structures (such as the hippocampus and amygdala) can differ by a factor of 3–5 between individuals, influencing memory, emotionality, and behavior.
Individual differences among geniuses are greater than interspecies differences among animals, making standardized education or testing of geniuses impossible.
7. The Evolutionary Role of Geniuses
Geniuses are not subjects of positive evolutionary selection. They are unstable, poorly reproducible, and do not guarantee mass survival.
Nature tends to preserve stable, average traits rather than extreme deviations.
Genius increases variability but decreases the stability of the population. Thus, biological mechanisms work against the mass spread of exceptionality.
Social systems stabilize society by suppressing non-conformity and supporting average behavioral models.
Biological dominance in human society (e.g., success in politics) does not require high intelligence but is driven by basic instincts of aggression, dominance, and adaptability.
Conclusion
Genius is a biological accident, a rare deviation, not the pinnacle of human development. Education, society, and evolution do not support exceptionality. Understanding the nature of brain variability allows for a sober assessment of human capabilities and dispels illusions of equal intellectual opportunities.
Geniuses are born not because of society’s efforts, but in spite of them.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.